Autoform DM Performance Data

This page provides performance data that shows Autoform DM’s processing speed when doing specific tasks. These tests were performed under the hardware environment described below.

Note

This performance data should be regarded as indicative only. Your Autoform DM system’s performance may differ.

This can be due to multiple factors, such as hardware specification and software configuration.

Environment

The following sections describe the hardware, Autoform DM configuration, and input and output data sizes that were used for these tests.

Hardware

This performance testing was done on dedicated hardware and used two hosts that had the following configuration:

• 1 x Intel i7 8700K 3.7GHz (4.7GHz Turbo) 6 Cores (12 Threads)

• 64 GB RAM

• SSD drives

• 1 GB network adapter

These hosts ran virtual machines under the following configuration.

Host 1

Host 2

System Size

The tests measured the performance of the following Autoform DM system sizes. Although the number of documents is the main factor that influences performance, the number of document definitions and key definitions are also major factors.

• Small: 5 document definitions, 20 key definitions, 3 line items, 10 million documents

• Medium: 10 document definitions, 30 key definitions, 3 line items, 50 million documents

• Large: 20 document definitions, 50 key definitions, 3 line items, 200 million documents

Input Data Size

The performance tests used the following input data sizes:

• 0 KB: Metadata only (no attachment)

• 100 KB: Metadata and PDF document attachment

• 200 KB: Metadata and PDF document attachment

• 1 MB: Metadata and PDF document attachment

• 2 MB: Metadata and PDF document attachment

Execution Standards and Measurements

The tests used Autoform DM REST endpoints.

Each combination in the data tables below is considered to be a distinct test. For example, small system standalone — 100 KB input data, medium system standalone — 1 MB input data, and so on. We ran each test three times under the stated hardware configuration and using the same number of threads, and then calculated the average of the test’s results. The tests used 10 simultaneous threads to simulate realistic usage.

We endeavored to eliminate temporary environmental problems. For example, we paused Windows updates during test execution to prevent background processes from affecting CPU load.

We measured throughput and execution time:

• Throughput was measured in actions per second (a/s).

• Execution time was measured in seconds.

Test Results

The following sections provide version-specific Autoform DM performance data, which shows system performance in specified scenarios.

The results show Autoform DM’s performance when using 10 simultaneous threads to create, get, or search documents.

“Create” and “get” tests used five input data sizes:

• 0 KB

• 100 KB

• 200 KB

• 1 MB

• 2 MB

“Search” tests used three data sizes (result per page/total results):

• 1/1

• 0/100

• 25/1000

Autoform DM 10.0

Create Documents

Summary table (a/s)

Get Documents

Summary table (a/s)

Search Documents

Summary table (a/s)

Autoform DM 10.3

Create Documents

Summary table (a/s)

Get Documents

Summary table (a/s)

Search Documents

Summary table (a/s)

Autoform DM 10.5

Create Documents

Summary table — Create documents [a/s] (POST requests)

Get Documents

Summary table — Get documents [a/s] (Get requests)

Search Documents

Summary table — Search documents (a/s)